Just stick men on an iceflow: Carleton U attempts to revoke funding to charities that help “primarily men”

Tuesday, December 16, 2008 17:00
Posted in category Health, Male defense

In case anyone thinks I’m exaggerating how bad it’s gotten to be a member of the “patriarchy” in this politically correct multiculturally obsessed society, consider the recent motion passed by the Carleton University Student Administration to stop donating to the Cystic Fibrosis Foundation.  The reason is that the disease apparently affects “only white people, and primarily men” and they should only fund charities that “will serve their diverse communities.“  Let’s remember that universities across Canada support breast cancer charities, despite the fact that they already get 40 times as much funding as prostate cancer and both diseases have roughly equal rates of mortality.

In addition to funding a Womyn’s Centre with 2 paid staff members, the organization that supposedly concerns themselves with giving only to charities that represent the diversity of their students has donated to, among other places

1.  Hopewell Eating Disorder Support Centre at their 2007 Charity Ball.  Only 10% of adults with eating disorders are male and Hopewell apparently doesn’t even  help them, referring them elsewhere.

It is not uncommon for boys and men to develop eating disorders. About 10% of adults with eating disorders are male, and this number is higher amongst adolescents.

If you are a male experiencing an eating disorder, check these sites out for information and support resources:

2.  Harmony House Women’s Shelter at their 2003 Charity Ball, despite the fact that men are equally likely to be battered by women.  Wouldn’t affirmative action suggest they fund the rarely funded mens’ shelters?

The funding was eventually re-instated and the relevant individuals thankfully resigned.  Here are some of the poignant comments that contributed to this remarkably rare success.

I for one would like to thank CUSA. They are among the first to openly display sexist and racist attitudes becoming common in today’s “PC” world.  This is a wakeup call for those among us who truly value equality and freedom. While we fight for the rights of others and tip toe around issues possibly offensives to non white males, we are loosing our own place in society.  Respect is deserved by all.

What scares me is the callousness of this decision by the CUSA, regardless of the back tracking, regardless of their heartfelt apology, I’m worried. Is this how this generation sees white males? Stick us on an ice flow?

>> They apologized..and they made ammends.

No, they have not.  At no point has anyone from CUSA admitted that they deliberately tabled and passed a flagrantly racist and sexist resolution.  They’ve apologized because it brought negative publicity, they’ve apologized because it appeared to damage CF. But they’ve wholly, totally, completely missed the entire point regarding why people are upset.  Of course, they’ve missed the point because they are not, in fact, sorry about having demonstrated that they are racist, sexist jerks.  That aside, if it was racism to anyone other than white people, or sexism toward women instead of men, would anyone be saying “well, if they apologize we’ll forget about it.” I don’t think so. They’d want a head on a stick.  I’ll forgive them when they’ve been fully subjected to the whole treatment to which they would subject a person who suggests that breast cancer charities should not be supported because it primarily affects women, or that AIDS charities should not be supported because it primarily affects black Africans and Asian sex-trade workers.  Honestly, I don’t care about their apology. A forced apology is of no value.

The following is from The National Post Editorial “Disgrace at Carleton” :

But even if it were true that only white males got CF, what of it? We raise money for breast cancer even though it is primarily a female disease. We raise money for Tay-Sachs, even thought it strikes almost exclusively Jews. We raise money for AIDS, even though it disproportionately affects gays and blacks. That’s because we raise money to save people — not tribes.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
  • Fark
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • BlinkList
  • MySpace
  • Socialogs
  • blogmarks
  • Live
  • Ma.gnolia
  • Upnews
You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

5 Responses to “Just stick men on an iceflow: Carleton U attempts to revoke funding to charities that help “primarily men””

  1. Komal says:

    December 16th, 2008 at 9:07 pm

    Although I agree that CU did something wrong, I am quite disturbed by this blog. I have been to a few of the events hosted by the Center for Inquiry Ontario and enjoyed them, and respected Justin Trottier for directing the CFIO. I have also seen Justin Trottier on the Michael Coren show, and agreed with some of his views.

    However, I must say that this blog is enough to compel me to distance myself from the Freethought ‘movement,’ insofar as the ‘movement’ is spearheaded by people who hold such views.

  2. Justin says:

    December 17th, 2008 at 12:53 am

    You’re certainly entitled to your opinion. I just wish you felt the same. I find it ironic that you would wish to distance yourself from a FREETHOUGHT movement because of the FREE THINKING of one of its leaders. The freethought movement has no dogma or doctrine, and it includes both many feminists and many feminist critics. If you would care to comment on which of the many blog posts are factually incorrect or overly offensive, I would be happy to engage you in a discussion.

  3. Frances Roberts says:

    December 17th, 2008 at 9:34 am

    Even if you don’t agree with this blog, how can you possibly make that an excuse to distance yourself from the freethought movement? It clearly isn’t claiming to be a freethought blog, it just happens to be written by an individual who also works with the freethought movement. It’s like creationists discounting all of natural selection theory because Darwin may have got some parts wrong.

  4. SimonSays says:

    December 18th, 2008 at 1:03 am

    What is your source for the claim that men are equally likely to be battered by women?

  5. JonA says:

    December 19th, 2008 at 12:24 pm

    SimonSays: While looking for the source of Justin’s claim, I came upon this interesting journal article, it’s definitely worth a read.

Leave a Reply